Victims of harassment under the Cyber Security Act of 2023 called for its repeal, arguing that it perpetuates the oppressive nature of the Digital Security Act of 2018. Despite public demand for reform, they claim the new law, which came into effect on September 18, continues to undermine freedom of speech.
At a roundtable discussion on the Cyber Security law, held at the National Press Club on Tuesday, victims of the law shared their personal experiences and renewed their calls for the law's abolition.
Media worker Sangita Aparajita recounted her ordeal under the Digital Security Act after posting on Facebook in protest against an injustice involving a powerful member of the Awami League. She was threatened and pressured into a settlement, she said, describing the legal action taken against her and the chilling effect it had on her ability to speak out.
Dilip Roy, a student at Rajshahi University during the Sundarbans movement, shared the harrowing experience of his father, journalist Kajol Ahmed, who was abducted following Dilip’s online support for the movement. He highlighted a direct threat made by then-Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina against those involved in the movement.
During the meeting, participants unanimously demanded the complete repeal of the Digital Security Act, saying that it has been used to silence dissent. They expressed concerns over the inhumane conditions they faced during imprisonment and argued that no law should be used to suppress free speech or target individuals for their opinions.
Many speakers detailed the physical abuse victims suffered while in jail, as well as the repeated denials of bail. They not only called for the repeal of the law but also demanded respect, compensation for all victims, and accountability for those who orchestrated their harassment. The government should not have unilateral power to create laws like this, they emphasized, urging for necessary reforms.
Among the other participants voicing their concerns were activists Shadhona Mahal, Didarul Islam, and Dipti Rani Das. They collectively argued that the law was not amendable, but illegal and illegitimate from the start.
